Featured Posts

James Foley: One of Us

August 28, 2014

THE BUSINESS OF USEFULNESS

August 11, 2013

How to be a Real Player

October 20, 2014

1/5
Please reload

Recent Posts

The Difference Between 'Talk' Identities and 'Walk' Realities

July 5, 2015

Digging Up Bodies and Buried History

May 24, 2015

The Irrational Vote

December 16, 2014

Self plus Us = Win-Win

November 16, 2014

How to be a Real Player

October 20, 2014

The Moves of a Mindful Change Agent

October 15, 2014

Without Labels, Without Blame

October 10, 2014

Learning By Doing: A Reflection

September 15, 2014

James Foley: One of Us

August 28, 2014

Do I Have to Change?!

August 15, 2014

Please reload

Abraham Lincoln

Black Lives Matter

Civil War

Gettysburg

Memorial Day

Slaves

adrian peterson

andrea morisette grazzini

anhueuser-busch nfl

aristotle

bill doherty

bill george

bridget siljander

buddhism

business ethics

business operations

bystander effect

center for democracy and citizenship

change agent

charleston

chris nechanicky

circle

citizen professionalism

citizens

civic engagement

civic responsibility

civil rights

collaboration

college

common good

common wisdom

community bookshelf

confederate flag

connection through art

connection through music

conscious capitalism

cris carter

cultural dance

culture change

danielle allen

david kenyon

diversity

dixon white

domestic violence

eagan mn

economic

eli manning

ellen langer

empathy

espn

ethic

ethics

experiential learning

gender violence

gene grazzini sr.

habitata

harry boyte

healing racial videos

hidden humanity

homogenuity

i have a dream

interns

james foley

janey rice

jason witten

john mackey

judgement

judging

lakeville mn

leadership

make a difference

march on washington

martin luther king

me to we racial healing

millennials

mindfulness

minnesota vikings player violence

nascar

nfl domestic violence

organizational psychology

paul hardt

personal mission

personal narrative

peter levine

power of action

psychological projection

purpose

racial divide

racial healing

rape

ray rice

real people leader

relational change

relational politics

roger goodell domestic violence

rory sampair

self actualization

self motivation

servant leader

seven virtues

sigrid iversen

social capital

social media

social norms

social psychology

stakeholders

superficial norms

thrive by five

tipsandroots

trade associations

transformative relationships

unions

usefulness

vision

voting

walmart

where the hell is matt

white supremacy

whole foods

win-win

work

youth legacy foundation

zen

Please reload

Search By Tags

The Irrational Vote

December 16, 2014

 

 WEAre by Peter Levine, PhD

(Part of an ongoing Newsletter series authored by WetheP colleagues.)

 

 

According to leading thinkers from Aristotle to Danielle Allen,

we can and should be friends with our fellow citizens. 

Friendship is personal. It presumes or aims at some commonality of interest. Although impersonal politics may yield liberty and equality, it does not produce fraternity or solidarity--goods that many of us prize. 
 

What Voting Can't Do


People gain more agency in relational than in impersonal politics. In a presidential election in the United States, 100 million citizens may vote. Each voter exercises Archimedean leverage over the government, but very little of it--so little that rational-choice analysis suggests it is irrational to vote at all.

If agency is valuable, then people need spaces in which

We Are the Ones We Have Been       they can hope to influence peers and and see results.

Waiting For, by Peter Levine is a

primer to help anyone help revive       Web of Relationships

civic life and restore citizens' role.      

                                                            Further, research on social capital suggests that impersonal

forms of politics, such as representative democracy and market exchange,  depend upon a web of constructive relationships among citizens. If anomie prevails, then impersonal forms of politics begin to break down as well as individuals withdraw their consent or cease to contribute to the public good.
 
Ethical Interactions


Notwithstanding doleful examples of “office politics" and neighborly gossip, relational politics also opens possibilities for ethical interactions. If you know another person’s interests and values, you can try to honor them. Although some must lose when interests conflict, if the winners are ethical, they can mitigate the damage on people whom they view as friends. 

Moral Growth
Perhaps most importantly of all, we can learn from personal politics, seeing the world from other perspectives and enlarging our mentalities. To be sure, we can also learn from statistics and impersonal arguments, but the experience of actually interacting with another person on matters of common concern seems indispensable for moral growth.

Peter Levine is Director of The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE) and the Lincoln Filene Professor of Citizenship and Public Affairs at Tufts University's Tisch College. He is author of numerous books, including his most recent: We Are the Ones We're Waiting For. See more at his Blog for Civic Renewal. 
 

Tags:

peter levine

circle

aristotle

danielle allen

social capital

voting

relational politics

Please reload

BLOG 

Post

 

 

  • WetheP

  • Businesses

  • Communities

  • Blog

  • More